Brazil reassures WTO members about its meat safety measures
Brazil updated WTO members on the measures it has taken to ensure the safety of its meat and meat products at a meeting of the WTO’s Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures on 22 and 23 March.
Since the start of its investigation into irregularities in meat inspections, several measures have been taken to “ensure the safety and quality of the products”, the Brazilian delegation said. At the same time, the alleged misconduct only applied to a fraction of Brazil’s “solid and trustworthy” sanitary controls on animal products, the delegation told WTO members. It further reassured its trading partners that “the Brazilian regulatory system is among the most frequently and strictly audited and monitored worldwide”.
According to Brazil, the Federal Police launched an investigation on 17 March 2017 into irregular practices involving certification of meat and meat products in 21 meat processing facilities that handle beef, poultry and pork products. These initial findings were taken very seriously by the authorities, and facts were being thoroughly checked and investigated by the Ministry of Agriculture. President Michel Temer had convened a meeting over the weekend of 18-19 March 2017 to assess the safety of domestic and international consumers with regard to the quality of meat produced in the country.
Brazil urged members to take into account this information and not to resort to measures which would run counter to WTO disciplines.
No WTO member took the floor after Brazil’s intervention.
Specific trade concerns
The Committee reviewed three new specific trade concerns and 12 previously raised concerns regarding food safety, plant and animal health measures.
New trade concerns
Viet Nam’s import suspension of groundnuts
Senegal questioned Viet Nam’s decision to suspend imports of its groundnuts on 11 July 2016. The decision, according to Viet Nam, was triggered by the fact that containers of peanuts shipped from Senegal were found to be infected with two destructive pests.
Senegal argued that this issue concerned only one company, and that the government had since taken measures to ensure that Senegalese exporters abide by the relevant standards. As groundnut exports to Viet Nam accounted for a major share of Senegalese exports, Senegal asked Viet Nam to reconsider the import suspension.
US proposed withdrawal of residue tolerance for chlorpyrifos
Israel, supported by Ecuador, drew attention to the US proposed rule to revoke pesticide residue tolerances for chlorpyrifos, a common insecticide used on many agricultural crops.
Israel said that while it recognized the aim to protect consumer health and safety, the proposed rule to withdraw the residue tolerance was overly restrictive and did not take into account all risk elements. Israel further noted that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposal to revoke all food residue tolerances for the insecticide chlorpyrifos by 31 March 2017 would trigger a significant effect on exports of both pesticides and fresh agriculture products.
The United States responded that the EPA is in the process of considering all comments from the public, including those from its trading partners, in finalizing its decision. It further added that the WTO SPS Agreement provides room for members to go beyond international standards, as long as the measure is based on a risk assessment.
EU import ban on Russian poultry due to bird flu
Russia and the EU discussed the EU’s country-wide import ban of Russian poultry products following recent outbreaks of avian influenza or “bird flu”.
According to Russia, the EU failed to recognize the regional nature of bird flu outbreaks and had banned imports of poultry products from the whole territory of Russia, resulting in unnecessary barriers to trade.
The EU responded that it is in contact with Russia to assess its request to recognize disease-free areas in relation to the bird flu outbreaks. However, the lack of submission of necessary information had resulted in significant delays in its assessment. The EU said that it would proceed to an evaluation as soon as the information was made available.
Previously raised concerns
EU criteria to identify endocrine disruptors
Import restrictions on Japanese foods
African swine fever
The US seafood monitoring programme
China: transparency of its food safety measures
Report of informal discussions
Members heard a report of the informal discussions that were held prior to the formal meeting. The discussions revolved around a proposal by Kenya, Uganda and the United States (G/SPS/W/292) on possible next steps for consideration by the SPS Committee following the workshop on pesticide maximum residue levels (MRLs). The proposal suggests a few follow-up actions in order to advance the Committee’s work on pesticide MRLs.
Members also discussed a joint submission by Chile and the European Union (G/SPS/W/290) to improve information sharing, specifically, a suggestion to post unofficial translations of notified regulations on the WTO website and a suggestion to facilitate access to information about SPS measures that are in force.
A third suggestion, which proposed the organization of an informal meeting to discuss members’ practices in identifying trade facilitating measures, was put into practice prior to the formal meeting. Specifically, a thematic session on the notification of trade facilitating measures was held, where members exchanged experiences on how trade-facilitating measures are identified in the notification process.
Other discussions in the informal meeting focused on the US proposal for concluding the Committee’s Report on the Fourth Review (G/SPS/W/291) as well as the joint proposal by Canada and Kenya on a catalogue of instruments available for WTO members to manage SPS issues (G/SPS/W/279/Rev.2).
Overall, members indicated they needed more time to assess the proposals, while reiterating their interest in continuing discussions.
The meeting was chaired by Mr Felipe Hees of Brazil, who acted as the interim chairperson for the Committee.
FAO/WHO Trust Fund
The WHO informed the Committee of the funding constraints facing the FAO/WHO Codex Trust Fund and encouraged WTO members to further support the effective participation of developing countries by making a contribution to the Trust Fund (G/SPS/GEN/1534).
Want to know more?
The SPS Information Management System (SPS IMS) includes all SPS-related measures notified by WTO members and the trade-related concerns discussed in previous SPS committee meetings.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200