No proof to apply trade defence on fertiliser imports: VN Competition Authority
There’s no evidence showing that fertiliser imports have damaged local fertilser products to apply trade defence measures for the imports, according to a report by the Việt Nam Competition Authority (VCA) under the Ministry of Industry and Trade.
According to the report sent to the ministry, the authority said two nitrogenous fertiliser production enterprises in Việt Nam, Hà Bắc and Ninh Bình, faced many difficulties due to an increase in coal price over the past months.
Việt Nam has four plants producing nitrogenous fertiliser, including two plants producing fertiliser from gas — Phú Mỹ and Cà Mau — with an annual capacity of 800,000 tonnes each. The two remaining plants, Hà Bắc and Ninh Bình, use technology producing fertiliser from coal, with an annual capacity of 480,000 tonnes and 560,000 tonnes, respectively.
The authority said Phú Mỹ and Cà Mau had still earned profit because their selling price at VNĐ5,600 per kilo is higher than production cost at VNĐ4,500-4,800 per kilo.
Meanwhile, the production cost is at a higher level of VNĐ10,000 per kilo for the Ninh Bình fertiliser plant and VNĐ7,600 per kilo for the Hà Bắc plant. Therefore, the two plants’ products were unable to compete with imported fertiliser products.
Ninh Bình plant has been forced to suspend its production while Hà Bắc plant has also temporarily stopped production since August 2016 due to high inventory and annual output reaching just half of the capacity.
The VCA said the two enterprises producing fertiliser from coal had incurred losses because they were using outdated technology, while the global trend was the production of fertiliser from gas. Additionally, the two plants were buying coal at a higher price against the global price, baodautu.vn reported.
Therefore, there was not enough proof to conclude that the main reason they were facing difficulties currently was because of imports.
The fertiliser plants themselves have said the primary reasons for difficulties included the unreasonable value added tax policy and the higher purchase price of coal against the world coal price.
Source: VNS
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200