Workshop on government procurement concludes in Geneva
Some 50 senior government officials from 42 WTO members and observers discussed government procurement as it relates to trade, good governance and inclusive sustainable development at the 2019 Advanced Global Workshop on Government Procurement held at the WTO from 13 to 17 May.
The purpose of the workshop was to foster dialogue among experts from across the world and to provide them with tools for the analysis, design and implementation of government procurement policies at the national level, including market opening, reforms and capacity-building. The participants pooled their knowledge with experts from international organizations and academia, including the George Washington University Law School, the University of Nottingham School of Law, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the World Bank, the OECD, the European Commission and the WTO Secretariat (for the full list of organizations, see below).
In his opening address on 13 May, WTO Deputy Director-General Xiaozhun Yi said: “This is a ‘flagship’ activity for us to disseminate information and foster dialogue on government procurement in all its dimensions. Government procurement is a key economic sector, representing 15 to 20 per cent of GDP in most economies. It has major implications for growth, competitiveness and the welfare of citizens.”.
Particular focus was placed on the revised WTO Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA), under which WTO members open their procurement markets in a reciprocal manner to the extent that they so agree, and how it contributes to enhancing transparency and market access in this sector.
The GPA’s growing relevance in today’s global economy was emphasized, as evidenced by the increasing number of WTO members seeking to join the Agreement (most recently, on 5 May 2019, Australia became the 48th GPA party). Participants also looked into the potential benefits of participating in the WTO Committee on Government Procurement as observers. The number of such observers has been increasing and diversifying over the recent years. In May 2019, two WTO members sought observer status: the Philippines (requested on 6 May) and Ecuador (requested on 14 May). Both requests will be considered by the Committee when it next meets on 26 June 2019.
The workshop looked at how the GPA can better respond to the evolving global policy landscape that now embraces areas such as e-procurement, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and sustainable public procurement. It also considered the implications of such policies for future domestic reforms and for achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Synergies with other initiatives at the national, bilateral and regional levels were also discussed.
Participating economies and institutions
Participants comprised some 50 senior officials with policy responsibility and/or a demonstrated background in trade and/or government procurement policy matters from the following 42 economies and one institution.
Economies: Argentina; Belarus; Bolivia, Plurinational State of; Botswana; Brazil; Canada; China; Colombia; Costa Rica; Côte d’Ivoire; Czech Republic; Dominica; Dominican Republic; Ecuador; Egypt; Equatorial Guinea; Honduras; Hong Kong, China; India; Indonesia; Korea, Republic of; Kyrgyz Republic; Madagascar; Malawi; Mali; Mauritius; Moldova, Republic of; Nepal; Nigeria; Peru; Philippines; Russian Federation; Saint Kitts and Nevis; Senegal; Singapore; Sri Lanka; Tajikistan; Togo; Turkey; Uganda and Ukraine.
Institution: Eurasian Economic Commission
Speakers’ organisations
The workshop benefited from the inputs of policy practitioners and experts from academia, international organisations and national authorities including the following: the Asian Development Bank; the Canadian Permanent Mission in Geneva; the Central European University; the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development; the European Commission; the George Washington University Law School; the OECD; the Open Contracting Partnership; the Swiss Federal Administrative Court; the University of Nottingham School of Law; the World Bank; and the WTO Secretariat.
Source: wto.org
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239